add current profile annotations to CVO manifests#51
add current profile annotations to CVO manifests#51openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
Conversation
This is matches openshift/enhancements#414 and doesn't change existing behavior
|
Hi @guillaumerose I have a question: the enhancement proposes that manifests must contain at least one inclusion annotation, and the default profile is |
|
Hi @andfaso. The naming discussion started in this comment openshift/enhancements#414 (comment). I don't have much than this thread. The main point is that they prefer explicit over implicit inclusion and |
Thanks. Some of the existing resources already had an exclusion profile define ( |
Yes, it should be fine. Only the annotation for the profile being used is examined. See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/cluster-profiles.md for details. /approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dhellmann, guillaumerose The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/lgtm |
This is matches openshift/enhancements#414 and doesn't change existing behavior